Strategies for innovating into the future:

Global futurist and author Jack Uldrich offers essential strategic information on nanotechnology, robotics, biotechnology, RFID and many other future technologies to help you prosper as exponential trends converge at this unique moment in history.





Recent Videos




Future Technology Blog Recent Posts

Is Evolution Exponential?

Posted on May 09, 2008 - 08:56 AM

image

When Charles Darwin first proposed writing his landmark book on evolution, The Origins of Species, his editor suggested writing a book on pigeons because, in his words, “Everyone is interested in pigeons.” Fortunately, Darwin chose to ignore the advice. I am reminded of the story because even though Darwin’s theory was proposing only that species make modest, incremental changes over long periods of time, it was—and in many circles still is—a revolutionary idea.

What then happens if evolution is not just incremental in nature but rather exponential? That, too, is a revolutionary idea—especially since it could impact us within our lifetimes.

Well, we are now approaching a time when this exponential theory of evolution will be put to the test.

If you accept the notion of evolution, you will agree that the earliest life appeared on earth approximately 4 billion years ago. Complex cellular organisms showed up 2 billion years ago, and the first multicellular organism about 1 billion years ago. The first reptiles and dinosaurs made their appearance 300 million years ago; the first primates 40 million years ago; homo sapiens appeared 160,000 years ago; Cro-Magnon man 40,000 years ago; and modern civilization as we know it began about 10,000 years ago.

Thinking about this much progress over such an extended period of time is difficult. Years ago, Carl Sagan, the famed astronomer, offered up a “cosmic calendar” to make such progress more comprehensible to the layperson. He asked that they imagine the entire history of the universe as being compressed into a single year.

Under this scenario the year would begin on January 1 with a bang—the Big Bang. Nothing much would then happen in our corner of the universe until about August when the sun would make its appearance. The earth itself wouldn’t show signs of any life until November—when the first multicellular organisms begin wiggling about. Dinosaurs show up around Christmas Eve. At 10:15 AM on December 31, apes would appear; humans would begin walking upright at 9:24 PM; modern civilization would appear at 11:59:20; Rome would fall at 11:59:57; and the Renaissance would occur just one second before midnight.

Rather amazingly, everything else—the printing press, the steam engine, electricity, the computer, the Internet, the human genome project, stem cell research, nanotechnology, etc—would be squeezed into the last second. From this perspective, I would argue that evolution can thus be seen as yet another exponential trend.

So what does it mean? If you accept the premise that each additional doubling of an exponential trend contains as much change as all the previous doublings combined, then it means that humans in our present form are not be the endpoint of humanity but merely a steppingstone to the next evolutionary stage.

Related Posts

10 Reasons We Will Live to 1000
Don’t Incrementalize Yourself into the Future
Dangerous Curves Ahead
Exponential Evolution
A Useful Analogy for Thinking About the Future
Think 10X, Not 10%
Einstein, Intel and All the Rice in China
Do You Believe in the Tooth Fairy
How to Turn 2 Cents into $5.36 Million
Embracing Change

Jack Uldrich is a writer, futurist, public speaker and host of jumpthecurve.net. He is the author of seven books, including Jump the Curve and The Next Big Thing is Really Small: How Nanotechnology Will Change the Future of Your Business. He is also a frequent speaker on future technology and future trends, nanotechnology, innovation, change management and executive leadership to a variety of businesses, industries and non-profit organizations and trade associations.

Enjoy this post? Bookmark at the following sites.

BlinkList Favicon   BlogMemes Favicon   blogmarks Favicon   co.mments Favicon   del.icio.us Favicon   Digg Favicon   Furl Favicon   Google Bookmarks Favicon   Ma.gnolia Favicon   MyShare Favicon   Spurl Favicon   Technorati Favicon   Windows Live Favicon   YahooMyWeb Favicon  

Email This Article To A Friend

Hi Jack,
I think you’re giving undue weight to recent events, and misinterpreting how evolution works.

The billion years you cite between the first cellular organisms and the advent of multi-cellular organisms is a long period, yes. -But the change that occurs is very significant. Cells learning to function together, and specialize for the first time requires a much more fundamental change than the evolution from ape to human.

In the last 40 million years, we’ve gone from the first primates to us; slightly different primates. I think that events close to the present are appearing more important to you, when from a biological perspective they really aren’t.

Last, the notion of evolution in itself having a nature; “exponential”, or linear - this notion is misinformed. Remember that evolution is not guided in anyway. It’s simply the preservation of new traits the reproduction. Do you wish to argue that the more a species evolves the more prone to evolution it is? If so, you need to explain where the increase in genetic variation will come from- or what will promote faster breading. You haven’t done that.

Evolution is not a path. It is not a direction or a trend.

By Bri on 2008 09 18

Enter the following information and post your comments:

Name:

Email:

Location(country, state, etc.):

URL(your website):

Comment:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: